Finding a Balance between Diversity and Target Language: A Case of a Japanese Language Program in a Private University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/jll.2020.130Abstract
One of the challenges that language professionals face in our increasingly diverse communities is establishing a balance between diversity and language standards. While Standard Japanese can be considered a common language to interact with the majority of Japanese speakers who may not be accustomed to nonnative speech (ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines, 2012), the strict requirement to follow the monolingual standard may disregard the legitimacy of multilingual speakers, including nonstandard dialect speakers. This article discusses pros and cons of setting standards in language programs and relevant findings concerning the native speaker fallacy (Author, 2019). Then the author will share his shifting perspectives on errors, interlanguage, dialectal differences, and certain “nonstandard” practices (e.g. translanguaging) in his experience of training, hiring, and supervising teaching assistants at Brigham Young University.
References
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Language. 2012. Proficiency Guidelines 2012. https://www.actfl.org/publications/guidelines-and-manuals/actfl-proficiency-guidelines-2012/english/speaking. Accessed September 17, 2019.
Creese, Angela., Adrian. Blackledge, and Jaspreet. K. Takhi. 2014. The Ideal “Native Speaker” Teacher: Negotiating Authenticity and Legitimacy in the Language Classroom. Modern Language Journal 98(4): 937–951.
Doerr, Neriko. M. 2009. Investigating “Native Speaker Effects”: Toward a New Model of Analyzing “Native Speaker” Ideologies. The Native Speaker Concept: Ethnographic Investigations of Native Speaker Effects, ed. by N. M. Doerr, 15–46. New York, N.Y.: Mouton de Gruyter.
Flores, Nelson., and Jonathan. Rosa. 2019. Bringing Race into Second Language Acquisition. Modern Language Journal 103 (Supplement): 145–151.
Horwitz, Elaine. K. 1996. Even Teachers Get the B: Recognizing and Alleviating Language Teachers’ Feelings of Foreign Language Anxiety. Foreign Language Annals 29(3): 365–372.
Phillipson, Robert. 1992. Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
Mori, Hasegawa, and Jisuku, Suzuki, 2019. On Goals of Language Education and Teacher Diversity Beliefs and Experiences of Japanese-Language Educators in North America. Japanese Language and Literature.
Sato, Shinji, and Neriko M. Doerr. 2008. Bunka, kotoba, kyōiku: Nihongo/Nihon no kyōiku no “hyōjyun” o koete (Culture, language, and education: Beyond “standard” in Japanese/Japan’s education). Tokyo: Akashi Shoten.
Tanaka, Rina. 2013. The Concepts of “Native”/“Nonnative ” in Japanese Language Education: From the Reviews of Related Articles in Linguistics Research and Language Education (Japanese). Gengo bunka kyōiku kenkyū, 11, 95–111.
Author. 2016. Perceptions of Native and Nonnative Speakers and Observational Analysis of “Divergent” Japanese Language Teachers in Context. Ph. D. diss. The Ohio State University.
———. 2018. Characterizations of Native Speaker by Language Teachers and Students of Japanese and Chinese in the U.S. Journal of National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages 23(1): 97–130.
Vélez-Rendón, Gloria. 2010. From Social Identity to Professional Identity: Issues of Language and Gender. Foreign Language Annals 43(4): 635–649.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Licenseor its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
- The Author agrees to digitally sign the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work.